It turns out that there are better ways to reduce carbon emissions than risking meltdowns, or managing and securing tonnes of weaponizable radioactive material for decades. Who'd have thought?
These totally obvious insights come courtesy of
Gregory Jaczko, who once served on the United States' Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and who had previously been a big believer in nuclear power's necessity when it came to combatting global climate change. It took him a while, but he's since come to exactly the opposite conclusion, as he writes in this length article on CommonDreams: